Marketing has deeply — and often negatively — shaped how women relate to training.
This isn’t a coincidence. It’s been a deliberate commercial strategy that distorts exercise science to fit social clichés and sell more. Let’s break it down:
🔥 1. Sexist segmentation disguised as personalization
Fitness marketing created “women-only workouts,” as if the female body required a radically different approach. Yes, there are some physiological differences (like lower muscle mass and hormonal responses), but the core principles of effective training — progression, overload, recovery, variety — are universal.
❌ The problem: Women have been told not to lift heavy or do pull-ups because it’s “for men,” limiting their potential for real strength and development.
🍑 2. Glute hypertrophy as the universal goal
The fitness industry struck gold by exploiting the desire to enhance glutes and legs. Entire programs are built around this, ignoring other key muscle groups like the back, core, and upper body.
❌ The result: muscular imbalances, poor posture, lower functionality — and ultimately, frustration from not achieving a strong, well-balanced physique.
📉 3. Quick promises, poor training
Marketing prioritizes immediate aesthetics over health or performance. “15-minute home workouts with bands” are sold as ideal for women — often with no progression, no structure, and no results.
❌ Outcome: stagnation, frustration, burnout — and worse, the normalization of mediocre training.
🧠 4. Fear-based messaging around “looking too muscular”
Many women have been conditioned to fear that lifting weights will make them “bulky.” In reality, building visible muscle takes years of consistency, smart training, and nutrition.
💡 This fear leads to avoiding fundamental lifts like deadlifts, pull-ups, or overhead presses — missing out on massive physical and mental benefits.
📲 5. The social media image trap
Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have turned training into a visual performance. Unqualified influencers push routines based on what “worked for them” — without context, science, or structure.
❌ This floods the space with shallow, misleading content and pulls women away from serious, empowering training.
✅ What should we actually be promoting?
• Full-body, balanced training
• Education on progression, form, and periodization
• Strength training as a foundation — even for those seeking “toning”
• A holistic approach: physical, functional, mental, and emotional well-being
It’s time to move beyond outdated clichés and empower women with science-based training that honors their full potential.
I hope this helps, if you have any questions about selection and prioritization, feel free to contact me.
Get your best version of yourself!
